Anaesthetic management of emergency Caesarean section followed by pulmonary embolectomy
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Anaesthetic Management of Parturient with Acute Atrial Fibrillation for Emergency Caesarean Section
A 31-year-antenatal lady with critical mitral stenosis presented for emergency caesarean section with fetal distress. She had acute onset atrial fibrillation. She was given a combined spinal epidural (CSE) anaesthesia and her arrhythmia was successfully managed after delivery of the baby with intravenous calcium channel blocker. Mitral stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease complica...
متن کاملAnaesthetic Management for Emergency Caesarean Section in a Parturient with Klippel Feil Syndrome
A 20 year old female with Klippel Feil Syndrome was scheduled for emergency caesarian section during her 1st pregnancy. We present the successful anaesthetic management of this patient highlighting the various anomalies associated with Klippel Feil Syndrome and the presence of a difficult airway.
متن کاملAnaesthetic management of a parturient with pulmonary stenosis and aortic incompetence for Caesarean section.
Anaesthetic management of Caesarean section in a parturient with severe pulmonary stenosis and aortic regurgitation is described. The valvular sequelae resulted from previous unsuccessful surgical correction (Ross procedure) of congenital aortic stenosis. This case demonstrates the importance of multi-disciplinary assessment and careful anaesthetic planning, to avoid deterioration in perioperat...
متن کاملEmergency Caesarean section: best practice.
Good multidisciplinary communication is crucial to the safe management of women requiring non-elective Caesarean section. Anaesthetists should participate actively in resuscitation of the fetus in utero; relief of aortocaval compression is paramount. Epidural top-up with levobupivacaine 0.5% is the anaesthetic of choice for women who have been receiving labour epidural analgesia. If epidural to...
متن کاملConsent of subjects for general anaesthetic in Caesarean section
random effects model may, indeed, have made more sense from a clinical perspective. However, it could equally be argued that the pain model was the only difference between studies, with all other aspects being clinically homogenous: we included clinical trials of high reporting quality that studied patients with similar levels of initial pain intensity and used consistent methods of measuring p...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
سال: 1989
ISSN: 0832-610X,1496-8975
DOI: 10.1007/bf03005422